powered by FreeFind

Apple iTunes

Mar 2019
Dec 2017
Jun 2017
Apr 2017
Oct 2016
Jul 2016
Feb 2016
Oct 2015
May 2015
Feb 2015
Sep 2014
Mar 2014
Feb 2014
Nov 2013
May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Apr 2012
Apr 2011
Dec 2010
Oct 2010
Aug 2010
Mar 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Aug 2009
Jun 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Feb 2009
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
Aug 2008
Jun 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Aug 2007
Jul 2007
Jun 2007
May 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007

Rewinding to KXAS-TV's explosive hidden camera investigation of a Dallas Cowboys "Triplet"

Hall of Famer Michael Irvin and ex-KXAS-TV newsman Marty Griffin

Note to readers: As the Dallas Cowboys begin another season, we revisit KXAS-TV's controversial "Tarnished Star" hidden camera investigation of All-Pro receiver Michael Irvin. Investigative reporter Marty Griffin and the Fort Worth-based NBC station became subjects of a national debate over the ethics of their alleged "checkbook journalism."

Those were the days when station managers and news directors were unafraid to speak their minds. KXAS also had a since disbanded investigative unit at the time. Griffin is now with KDKA-TV, Pittsburgh's CBS station. Irvin's in the Hall of Fame after pleading no contest to charges of cocaine possession. KXAS general manager Doug Adams now is president of the Dallas Symphony Orchestra. WFAA executive news director John Miller currently teaches journalism at Texas Christian University. This article originally was published on May 14, 1996.

Michael Irvin's trial still awaits him, but the court of public opinion seems to be weighing heavily against the tactics employed by KXAS-TV (Channel 5) in its "Tarnished Star" investigation of the Dallas Cowboys star.

The station's use of a hidden camera and its $6,000 payment to an informant during a highly competitive rating "sweeps" period are clearly unpopular among talk radio show callers and commentators, general manager Doug Adams agreed Friday. Channel 5 also has received a heavy volume of negative phone calls, he confirmed.

"There's a lot I'd like to say," he said. But at the advice of the station's attorneys, "our position from the beginning has been to let the stories play out. I would anticipate at some time we might talk about it."

Ethical questions about hidden cameras and paying for news aren't new to television journalism. But they have proved to e a particularly volatile combination in a case where the subject of the stories is a high-profile member of America's most talked-about football team.

"Are there any limits to the use of hidden cameras? Is Michael Irvin a sufficiently newsworthy figure to justify what otherwise might be construed as an invasion of privacy? These are very important questions to keep asking," said David Bartlett, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Radio-Television News Directors Association. "But I don't see anything to suggest that there is anything wrong with this story, unless I'm Michael Irvin's defense attorney."

Channel 5's dark, fuzzy video and at times murky audio purportedly link Irvin to cocaine buys made both before and after his April 1 indictment on drug charges in an unrelated case. Dennis Pedini, who drove Irvin after equipping his car with a hidden camera, was paid by the station for "licensing and assigning rights to KXAS for this videotape," viewers have been told.

Professor Tom Bigler, a former television news anchor and reporter who teaches a journalism ethics course at Wilkes University in Pennsylvania, said Channel 5 is clearly out of bounds.

"Checkbook journalism always is questionable. Personally, I despise it," Bigler said. "But to use it for entrapment is doubly wrong. Are they part of the police department? It's a rather unethical and sleazy approach to collecting news."

Despite the heavy criticism, Channel 5 has been dominating the 10 p.m. Nielsen ratings since "Public Defender" Marty Griffin's series began airing on Sunday.

Slightly past the halfway point of the May sweeps, which end on May 22, Channel 5 is in a strong position to dethrone perennial champion WFAA-TV (Channel 8). Through Thursday, Channel 5 had an 18.1 rating while Channel 8 was averaging a 16.7 rating. KDFW-TV (Channel 4) and KTVT-TV (Channel 11) each are running 10 or more points behind the two top stations. each point equals 18,200 households in the Dallas-Fort Worth viewing area.

Sweeps competitions, also held in November and February, are used to adjust the rates stations charge to advertisers. Channel 5 hasn't been No. 1 at 10 p.m. since November 1987, when the station tied Channel 8.

"They (Channel 5) very well might win, but so be it," Channel 8 executive news director John Miller said. "We'd rather be No. 2 than be doing what they're doing. It's almost to the point where they're programming the destruction of their credibility and people are watching it. Long-term, you're really hurting yourself."

Short-term, Channel 8 and other rival stations have been airing stories aimed at denting the credibility of Channel 5's paid informant. Channel 8 reporter Brett Shipp even went to the extent of telling viewers that Pedini owed more than $600 in traffic tickets. The station began one report with Irvin's attorney, Kevin Clancey, asking in a courthouse corridor, "Is the $6,000 man here yet?"

Channel 5's Adams said it is "interesting that some media outlets are ignoring a story on which they've been scooped in favor of a story that they choose to pursue instead. It's amazing how sanctimonious people get when they've been scooped."

Doug Adams and John Miller, former execs at KXAS and WFAA.

In its first segment of "Tarnished Star," Channel 5 hid Pedini's face and referred to him only as "Dennis." The station didn't disclose its $6,000 payment to Pedini until Tuesday's 10 p.m. newscast. On Wednesday, Channel 5's informant was subpoenaed and bound by a gag order that prohibits him from talking any further about Irvin.

Former Channel 5 "public defender" Mike Androvett, who recently became the co-partner of a media consulting firm, said that Pedini's apparently checkered past is typical of sources and informants. Earlier in the week, Pedini came to Androvett's offices for advice.

"Any investigative reporter just begs for the day that when he gets a good story, his source is absolutely pristine," Androvett said. "But they never, never are. They want to get noticed or maybe they want to get a little money out of it. By definition, these quandaries land at your door."

The Radio-Televison News Directors Association, which monitors newscasts and occasionally takes positions on ethical issues, is generally against paying for news, Bartlett said. But immediate disclosure of any such payments is "the more important aspect of the issue," he said. "Then the audience can make an informed judgment about the credibility of the story. Some people may think it kills it. Others may think it makes no difference at all."

Channel 8's Miller said that network and local news operations sometimes make legitimate payments for news footage obtained from outside sources. For instance, amateur video that appeared to show accused Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh in Waco recently was bought by Channel 11 for $500.

"That doesn't violate any ethical rules," Miller said. "It's similar to a newspaper buying a photo from somebody."

But paying for secretly obtained footage of Irvin in a private car amounts to "entrapment" of a man who already has been indicted, Miller said. "We wouldn't have set up that situation because our lawyers would have said, 'You're got to be crazy.' We don't play that game."

Channel 8 was criticized last year, however, for using a hidden camera in an attempt to expose alleged lax security at Sunset High School. A part-time intern for the station posed as a student and secretly took pictures until being discovered by school officials. The station subsequently apologized to Sunset principal Michael Stiles, who had complained about "extremely unethical" reporting procedures.

Charles Duncan, a former Channel 8 investigative reporter who left the station in 1989 to start a private detective agency, said he frequently has used hidden cameras in both professions.

"The camera was not put in Michael Irvin's car. He was getting into someone else's car who knew the camera was there," Duncan said. "I don't see a real problem there."

Duncan said he disagreed, however, with Channel 5's decision to both pay Pedini and "rely on him altogether."

"The Channel 5 reporter was not with Dennis at the time. He doesn't know what happened before, he doesn't know what happened after," Duncan said.

Former Channel 4 news director Mike Sechrist, currently general manager of a TV station in Nashville, said it is "always risky to give the camera to somebody else."

"You just don't know if you've been set up," he said. "When your people do it, you trust them."

Channel 5 would have been on firmer ground had it followed Pedini's car or staked out a location where Irvin allegedly purchased drugs, Sechrist said. "The way they got the story is taking away from the story itself."

Bartlett of the news directors' group said it does not have a position on use of hidden cameras, which increasingly have become commonplace on both local and network news programs.

"Our code of ethics addresses deception of the public," he said. "It's okay to deceive the bad guys, but you don't deceive the audience. And it's vitally important that you do not cross the line into invasion of privacy."

Was the line crossed in Irvin's case? Probably not, Bartlett said, because the Cowboys' star is a public figure whose alleged drug purchase "is a newsworthy story by any measure."

"After all, they're not taking hidden camera pictures to show that he's abusing his rose bushes," Bartlett said.